Public Representations is Now Online

My co-author Beth Herst and I are pleased to post that our new book, Public Representations: Screen Stories, Narrative, and the Public Sphere, is now online. It is available to anyone on the University of Toronto Press website at this link. You can download it as an e-Publication for your reader, or as a pdf, both in its entirety or chapter-by-chapter. And you can also buy a hardcover through the link.

Why Open Access?

As open access is a new approach to the publishing of academic books, it merits some explanation. Academic books ought to be published open access. They are supported almost entirely by the public sector through the salaries of university faculty, research grants, and publication grants. This is the case for our book, with the public sector paying Sandford Borins’s salary until 2021 and pension thereafter, and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) providing research and publication grants. Knowledge that is created through citizens’ tax dollars should be available at no additional cost to citizens. SSHRC has applied this principle to journal articles supported by its grants since 2015, but not yet to books.

The Inside Baseball

I’ll look a little more closely at the financing of our book in an open access context. The University of Toronto Library (UTL) allocated some of its funding to University of Toronto Press (UTP) to acquire this book. By doing this UTL is supporting and showcasing University of Toronto faculty and having the book available to the entire university in perpetuity. And it is encouraging other university libraries to do likewise.

With the funding UTP received from UTL as well as a publication grant from SSHRC, it will cover its fixed costs (editorial, production, marketing) associated with our book. As authors, we will receive a modest royalty out of UTL’s payment to UTP. If our book were not open access, faculty and students nonetheless would have free access to it through university libraries. By publishing it open access, we are also making it available for free to readers who would not normally have access to university library systems. We are therefore seeking to raise its visibility and increase its potential readership at some possible cost in foregone revenue.

A Public Good

We began this post by framing open access publication of books like ours in economic terms as the return due on public investment in academic research. There’s another economic term that’s equally relevant: public goods. Textbooks define these freely available, publicly provided goods or services as “non-excludable,” meaning people cannot be prevented from using them, and “non-rivalrous,” because use by one person does not diminish their availability for use by anyone else. Typically cited examples include infrastructure like street lighting and public roads and services like national defense and court systems, all funded through taxation and available to everyone.

We believe that the knowledge generated by academic research is also a public good, an essential, inexhaustible social resource and political catalyst that should be non-excludable. The fact that our book explores the screen media forms influencing how we understand and engage with the public sphere strengthens our conviction. We are in the midst of a constantly expanding surplus of “information” of unknown provenance, undisclosed purpose, and unverifiable import. Knowledge, in contrast, is increasingly a scarcity commodity. Academic research, in the humanities and social sciences particularly, is under attack by critics whose ideological motivations span the political spectrum. It is more important than ever to advance the status of such research as a public good. That is why we offer it as one. 

One response to “Public Representations is Now Online”

  1. Peter Sage Avatar

    I am thrilled to see this publication, both for its content and because of the way it is published. I am new to the idea of open source academic publishing, with the contents treated as a public good.

    I do consider this work a “public good” because I have benefited from it for several years and I am unaware of any good way to pay him for it. He puts ideas out there into the world, I read them, and I am better for it. I suppose I should thank the taxpayers of Ontario and Canada generally for their generousity. Sandy writes and publishes political observations about Canada and there is precious little news and commentary about Canada published in the mainstream news in the USA. Until just now, with Trump acting like an ignorant bully, scofflaw, and insulter-in-chief, Canada was like the well-behaved upstairs neighbor and so little trouble that we American take it for granted. A great trading partner. From time to times a great ally. Reasonable. Reliable. I get my news about Canada from him.

    More useful yet was an idea that he developed as an economist/political observer, a framework for looking at the narrative judo politicians use. Ones own candidate is the Hero, of course. The opponent is either a Knave or a Fool. The archetypes seem oversimple at first but political messaging is by necessity oversimple. It helped me understand the professional wrestling oversimplification of Trump’s behavior, and especially how it could be that a wresting Heel — the interesting anti-hero — could possibly be more popular than the Face. Trump is a Heel, but he made being a Heel into being the necessary remedy to the Foolish Face. I would not have tumbled onto this insight on my own.

    Financial remuneration would be one motivation for producing academic work, but by making this available for free, are giving that up. The authors recognize their work is a public good, so let me take a moment to say thank you for it. The recognition is tiny compared with the effort. But recognitiona and gratitude is a drop in the bucket of a cultural ethic that is worthwhile getting out there. It offers respect to education and respect for universities, and we need more of that now. We need to take a moment and recognize that ademics are citiens of the world making the world better and a little smarter.

    Sandy and I were undergraduates at the same time. He was the slender economics majory just down the hall at Moors Hall when Harvard and Radcliffe began going officially co-ed in its dorms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Posts