Questioning Doug Ford’s Resume

After looking at Doug Ford’s Wikipedia page and reading his 2016 book Ford Nation, I have questions about three areas of his resume: his role in the family business, his lack of post-secondary education, and his approach to politics.

Doug Ford describes himself in the book as an “independent Canadian business leader,” and has claimed that his role as president of the family business, Deco Labels and Tags, has demonstrated his managerial competence. Deco, however, is privately held and not required to report its financial results publicly, so it is impossible to judge. If Doug wanted to demonstrate his capability as a business executive, he would release Deco’s audited financial results for the years in which he was chief executive. (Fat chance, you say.)

He is still chief executive now, and that creates a major conflict of interest problem. What provisions will he make for Deco to be run entirely at arms-length so that, if elected premier, there are no conflicts of interest? The City of Toronto’s integrity commissioner concluded in December 2016 that, when Ford was a Toronto city councilor, he had improperly used his influence on behalf of two companies that were clients of Deco, so he already has history of conflict of interest. Traditionally, it has proven very difficult for the owners of a family business to turn over the leadership to a non-family manager.

The Wikipedia page also reports that when he was elected city councilor in 2010 Ford said he would donate his salary to community organizations. It is not clear whether he actually did this. To appear public-spirited, he could make a similar promise regarding his salary as premier, if elected. This, too, would represent a conflict of interest, because the source of his income would then be Deco, and he could therefore make decisions with a view to ensuring that it prospered.

In Ford Nation, Doug Ford admits that “I didn’t have the marks for university.” In 1984, he started at Humber College and “was bored silly in the lectures.” When faculty in the colleges soon went on strike, Ford quit and didn’t return when the strike ended a month later. I think the attack on “the elites” that is a theme of his campaign is an attempt to turn this weakness into a strength, arguing that advanced education is not necessary for political leaders.

I take a different perspective. In some major nations – notably the UK, France, and Japan – the widespread expectation is that political leaders will be the graduates of elite educational institutions. While I would not go quite that far, I do not think higher education is irrelevant or, as some current-day populists would have it, an impediment to political leadership. It is reasonable to expect that the premier of the province has succeeded at post-secondary education. It shows an ability to persevere at a challenging, long-term venture. In addition, university education imparts some habits of mind that are critical to effectiveness in politics, such as making tradeoffs and thinking systemically. Ford’s simplistic approach to policy issues – the subject of future blog posts – suggests that he lacks such abilities.

In Ford Nation Doug writes that the essence of his approach to politics is Deco’s approach to business, namely “customer service excellence.” Doug, like his late father and brother, takes pride in spending time on constituency service, always returning calls from constituents and often visiting them. While no constituent’s call should go unanswered, it is not clear that the best person to answer is a councilor or MPP. While it is valuable for a politician to know what the voters are thinking, it should not be his only priority in allocating his time.

The opportunity cost of a politician spending so much time on constituency service is that he spends too little time on learning and thinking about policy issues. This is not at all a surprising choice for a person without the marks to go into university and who was “bored silly in lectures.” A mind is a terrible thing to waste, especially when the mind in question is that of the Premier.

These unanswered questions about Doug Ford’s resume are critical. Maybe the election campaign will provide answers. Or maybe not. Why would he reveal anything more than required, especially if the public is not asking? In the run-up to the election campaign, both citizen media and the main-stream media, particularly investigative journalists and editorial boards, should be demanding more information from Doug Ford.


  1. Right on the money with that. I wish the media was you instead of what we got. Doug has no platform because he is an incompetent jerk who has no post secondary education, and probably limited high school given he spent his time with his school business project, dealing drugs, as was rumoured. Pushing forward his PRIVATE business experience as “expertise” is a joke if the PUBLIC has no access to his performance.

    • I totally agree with you, in your calling this idiot an incompetent jerk. What has happened to this lovely World.

  2. An excellent summary! Contains important points regarding Doug Ford’s lack of critical thinking or any training in the same. The piece also provides insightful comments on some of the less obvious concens regarding conflict of interest, if one is self-employed. Doug Ford’s established conflict of interest track record while on the Toronto City Council is also important. It seems time for a follow up piece by the same author … please.

    It’s extrememt unfortunate that the Ontario electorate was guided more by their hatred of Kathleen Wynne, rather than a critical assessment of Doug Ford and his proposed policies.

    For those who enjoy thoughtful analysis on a related theme, I recommend “Why People Believe Weird Things” by Michael Shermer. The book is an excellent read on the importance of clear critical thinking based on the available facts, as well as the perils unfounded group-think.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *